| Game analysis - Why is this a blunder?#4 Sorry, I meant http://en.lichess.org/KDpVpiJlkaP8 | Jaque_Mate |
| Game analysis - Why is this a blunder?#3 See: http://en.lichess.org/EVAbpNBkscS6 This is Stockfish vs. Stockfish... it would be cool to have a feature that plays the engine against itself in a position instead of having to do it manually... … | Jaque_Mate |
| Lichess Feedback - [Minor Bug] Opening Training#1 Hello, this is awesome, but when there is only one suggested move it says, "Find 1 strong moves". Thanks for the new feature. | Jaque_Mate |
| Lichess Feedback - Atomic Chess: Variant#1 Thank you so much for working hard to keep us with new things all the time. I just wanted to comment that when you create a game (an atomic game) it is not put in the bottom of the list under variants… | Jaque_Mate |
| Lichess Feedback - Preferences#3 I suppose that X meant, "I choose what X is". Thanks for the clarification :) | Jaque_Mate |
| General Chess Discussion - Can three-check be solved?#10 No pro. ... I was a bit confused, because I just read it and did not really delve into it. It feels like 3-check would be a lot easier to solve then chess in general, so it seemed like it might be pos… | Jaque_Mate |
| General Chess Discussion - Can three-check be solved?#8 Sorry, I thought that solvable meant that the computer could figure out if one side wins or is should be a draw. Like how checkers and connect-4 are solved, hence solvable. | Jaque_Mate |
| General Chess Discussion - Can three-check be solved?#6 What is "solvable" exactly mean? Does it mean within 10 years or what? | Jaque_Mate |
| General Chess Discussion - Can three-check be solved?#2 Hmm.... sounds interesting :) It feels like White always should win. | Jaque_Mate |
| Lichess Feedback - Preferences#1 Promote to Queen automatically: I feel that there should be a button on each game that has this so that in the game I can decide based on the position. Claim draw on threefold repetition automatically… | Jaque_Mate |
| Next |
|---|